|
W. bancrofti nocturnal periodic infection:
The problem of bancroftian filariasis from 1953 to 2001 is given in Table 1.
Table 1- Problem of
W. bancrofti infection at different points of time (in mill.)
|
Year
|
Population exposed to the risk of
infection
|
Mf Carriers
|
Filaria Disease Cases
|
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
Total
|
|
1953
|
-
|
-
|
25.00
|
-
|
-
|
|
1962
|
40.16
|
34.08
|
64.2
|
5.03
|
4.40
|
|
1970
|
84.91
|
51.39
|
136.30
|
11.30
|
8.00
|
|
1977
|
174.08
|
62.05
|
236.13
|
18.31
|
14.44
|
|
1981
|
221.92
|
82.18
|
304.00
|
21.74
|
15.84
|
|
1985
|
251.80
|
90.56
|
342.36
|
23.70
|
17.56
|
|
1989
|
275.36
|
98.94
|
374.30
|
25.00
|
19.00
|
|
1994
|
302.87
|
108.78
|
411.65
|
26.92
|
20.40
|
|
1999
|
334.39
|
120.10
|
454.49
|
29.72
|
22.52
|
|
2001
|
347.89
|
124.95
|
472.84
|
30.91
|
23.43
|
Though the disease has been prevalent since antiquity, no
organized survey had been made to estimate the problem in the country. Megaw and Gupta were the first to publish a
filaria map of India
in 1927 based on night blood surveys conducted in different parts of the
country. Jaswant Singh and Raghavan
highlighted the problem in 1953 and prepared an endemicity map, based on
replies to a questionnaire circulated to different states. The estimates made in 1962, 1970 and 1976
revealed the problem to be much higher than what had been estimated
earlier. In 1981, the delimitation
surveys throughout the country showed about 304 million people lived in
endemic areas. The latest estimates in
2001 indicate that about 473 million people are exposed to the risk of
bancroftian infection; of these about 125 million live in urban areas and
about 348 million in rural areas.
About 31 million people are estimated to be harbouring microfilaria
(mf) and over 23 million suffer from
filaria disease manifestations. Table 1 indicates
that the problem has increased manifold during the last five decades. The increase is mainly due to (i) extension
of delimitation surveys in hitherto unsurveyed districts (ii) natural growth
of population in the endemic areas and (iii) spread of infection to new areas
previously known to be non-filarious.
The estimates made in recent years were based on sample
surveys conducted during the last five decades in different districts as the
delimitation surveys in a district take two to three years to complete. Modern statistical methods are to be
adopted to complete the delimitation surveys as early as possible so that the
estimates are based on recent surveys instead of surveys conducted two to
five decades back. Recently repeat
surveys conducted in some towns showed a declining trend in bancroftian
infection because of better environmental sanitation and increased use of
personal prophylactic measures.
State-wise estimated distribution of population at risk,
number of mf carriers and number of persons with filaria disease manifestations in 2001 are given in Table-2.
It would be seen that the State of Bihar has
highest endemicity of over 17% followed by Kerala (15.7%), Uttar
Pradesh (14.6%). Andhra Pradesh and
Tamil Nadu have about 10% endemicity.
Goa showed the lowest endemicity of less than 1% followed by
Lakshadweep (1.8%), Madhya Pradesh (above 3%) and Assam (about 5%). The latter two States have pockets showing
high endemicity. Of over 23 million
disease cases in the country, Bihar, Jharkhand and Uttar Pradesh together contribute
more than 15 million cases, which constitute nearly two thirds of the total
number of cases in the country. The
seven States namely Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Kerala, Orissa, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal, where MDA pilot trials are being undertaken,
contribute over 86% of mf carriers and 97% of disease cases in the country.
Filaria endemicity map stratifying the country based on mf
rate as on 31st December,
1995 is shown in Fig.1.
Northern districts of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, coastal
districts of Orissa and eastern parts of Uttar Pradesh showed mf rate above
6%. Small pocket in Maharashtra, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, West
Bengal and Assam
also have mf rate above 6%. The
problem of filariasis is yet to be delimited in most of the districts in
Maharashtra and a few districts in Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh,
Orissa, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, West Bengal and Assam. The present estimates
reveal that bancroftian filariasis is endemic in 15 States and five Union Territories.
Table-2 State-wise
estimated population exposed to the risk of filariasis and estimated number
of mf carriers and filaria cases as on 31.12.2001 (in million)
|
S. No
|
Name of the State/UT
|
Population at Risk
|
No. of Mf carriers
|
No.of Disease cases
|
|
Total
|
Rural
|
Urban
|
|
1.
|
Andhra Pradesh
|
60.21
|
45.58
|
14.63
|
4.48
|
1.67
|
|
2.
|
Assam
|
11.69
|
10.50
|
1.19
|
0.44
|
0.10
|
|
3.
|
Bihar
|
72.02
|
62.81
|
9.21
|
4.88
|
6.70
|
|
4.
|
Chhatisgarh*
|
20.80
|
16.85
|
3.95
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
5.
|
Goa
|
1.39
|
0.82
|
0.57
|
0.01
|
NA
|
|
6.
|
Gujarat
|
20.60
|
12.41
|
8.19
|
1.24
|
0.16
|
|
7.
|
Jharkhand*
|
26.9
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
8.
|
Karnataka
|
13.28
|
10.14
|
3.14
|
0.85
|
0.09
|
|
9.
|
Kerala
|
35.33
|
26.41
|
8.92
|
2.80
|
2.76
|
|
10.
|
Madhya Pradesh
|
26.87
|
21.80
|
5.07
|
0.63
|
0.09
|
|
11.
|
Maharashtra
|
20.89
|
3.74
|
17.15
|
1.07
|
0.20
|
|
12.
|
Orissa
|
30.46
|
27.00
|
3.46
|
2.69
|
1.70
|
|
13.
|
Tamil Nadu
|
43.80
|
29.36
|
14.44
|
2.76
|
1.46
|
|
14.
|
Uttar Pradesh
|
112.29
|
95.12
|
17.17
|
7.90
|
8.46
|
|
15.
|
West Bengal
|
22.63
|
1.41
|
21.22
|
1.10
|
0.03
|
|
16.
|
Pondicherry
|
0.85
|
0.41
|
0.44
|
0.03
|
0.01
|
|
17.
|
A&N
Islands
|
0.24
|
0.19
|
0.05
|
0.01
|
NA
|
|
18.
|
Daman & Diu
|
0.08
|
-
|
0.08
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
19.
|
Lakshadweep
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
NA
|
|
20.
|
Dadra & N’ Haveli
|
0.15
|
0.14
|
0.01
|
0.01
|
NA
|
|
|
Total
|
472.84
|
347.89
|
124.95
|
30.91
|
23.43
|
NA: Not
Available * Provisional
The
North-Western States/UTs namely, Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh,
Punjab, Haryana, Chandigarh, Rajasthan, Delhi & Uttaranchal and
North-Eastern States namely Sikkim, Arunachal
Pradesh, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Manipur and Tripura are known
to be free from indigenously acquired filarial infection.
B.malayi Nocturnal Periodic Infection:
The infection is prevalent in the States of Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra
Pradesh, Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Assam and West Bengal. The single largest tract of this infection
lies along the west coast of Kerala, comprising districts of Trichur, Ernakulum, Alleppey, Kottayam, Quilon and Trivandrum, stretching
over an area of 1800 sq. km. The
infection in the other six States is confined to a few villages only. Surveys undertaken recently in Kerala and a
few villages in other States revealed either reduction of foci or complete
elimination of the parasite as well as the vector in many villages which were
known to be endemic for B. malayi infection
four decades back.
The declining trend of this infection is due to:
Filling
of Mansonia breeding places for real estate:
Removal
of host plants for lotus and fish culture;
Replacement
of Pistia stratiotes by Salvinia auriculata, a less hospitable host plant for
the principal vector;
Use
of residual insecticidal spray under NAMP which has markedly reduced B.malayi
vectors, and
Increased
use of microfilaricidal drugs as well as personal prophylactic measures due
to better health education of general public about the causation of disease.
Presently over 2.5 million people are exposed to the risk
of B.malayi filariasis with about two
lakh mf carriers and 1.25 lakh cases of filarial disease manifestations.
Nocturnal subperiodic B.malayi infection prevalent in some South-East
Asian countries has not been found to be present in India.
W. bancrofti
Diurnal Subperiodic Infection: During
1958 the National Institute of Communicable Diseases (formerly known as
Malaria Institute of India) conducted filaria survey in A&N Islands
and found circulating mf in day time also.
Subsequent surveys by NICD brought out the presence of diurnal
subperiodic W.bancrofti infection among the local inhabitants of Nicobar
Group of Islands. The surveys revealed that a few islands
namely Car Nicobar, Chowra and Kamorta – Nancowrie were endemic for this
infection. Since the survey was very
limited, it was not possible to know the trend of this infection. Entomological evidence indicates that Aedes
(Finlaya) niveus group of mosquitoes play the vectorial role. It was found that the infection is limited
to a few islands; the total population of these endemic islands is less than
10,000.
|