Core Programme Clusters

Health Systems Development (HSD)

Essential Drugs and Medicines

 

Drug Finance

*     Overview of reviews on drug pricing and financing

The focus of this report is on the key issue of pricing of drugs and pharmaceuticals in India. A number of studies on drug pricing are reviewed (appended to this chapter) which are focused on various aspects such as the Indian pharmaceutical industry (IPI), concepts of the pricing policies and regulations including the drug price control order (DPCO), the pharmaceutical policy (PP 2002), Indian patents regime (IPR) etc and the present perspectives and future accomplishments.

Indian Pharmaceutical Industry

The articles on pharma industry and its position in the global arena (Anirudh Gopala Krishnan, 2002; N Lalitha, 2002; Pradeep Agrawal, 2001; P Saibaba, 2001). Indicate that the Indian pharmaceutical industry is the largest in the developing world, having carved itself a niche in the manufacturing and export of drugs. The Indian Chemical Manufacturers Association (ICMA) reports that there are 10,000 manufacturing units across the country, of which 290 are in the large-scale sector, including 45 multinational companies. Further ICMA reports that India is “emerging as one of the largest and cheapest producers of pharmaceuticals in the world, accounting for nearly 8.5 percent of the world’s drug requirement in terms of volume, and ranks amongst the top 15 drug manufacturing countries in the world.” The pharmaceutical industry of India attained phenomenal growth in domestic production in the past two decades reducing the dependence on imports significantly.

Pharmaceutical Policies, Trips and Implications for Indian Drug Pricing

Few studies have focused specifically on the impact of pharmaceutical policies, including intellectual property related issues (Amit S Ray, 2003; Veena Mishra, 2001; Anant Phadke, 2000; Abhay Kumar; Richard Gerster, 2000). These studies indicate that the Indian Patent Act 1970 was a milestone in India’s march towards self-reliance in the field of drug production as it allowed Indian drug companies to produce a drug invented by any Multi National Company (MNC) through a different chemical or engineering process. The IPA 1970 adopted a policy of ‘process patents’ instead of the earlier policy of ‘product patents’. Because of this process patent regime, Indian drug companies started manufacturing many drugs previously monopolized by MNCs, thereby curtailing monopoly pricing. Therefore IPRs benefited the developing countries by encouraging foreign investment, by enabling transfer of technology and greater domestic research and development. Overall the Indian Patents Law of 1970 secured the Indian market. Since then, India has done without product patents with the exception of production processes that may be patented for seven years. In addition, the law allowed for compulsory licenses granted by the state, in case of a patent holder not granting voluntary licenses on fair conditions.

Major changes can be expected in the Indian pharmaceuticals industry from 2005 due to the agreement on TRIPS, under which India will be required to introduce product patents for pharmaceutical products. This will likely to lead sharp increases in the prices of newly patented drugs. Some studies dealt with the tracking of existing drug pricing practices. These reviews indicate that the pricing of medicines in India has always been a controversial issue. The key players have been the drug companies themselves, the government and the judiciary (Economic and political weekly, 2003).

 

The Tenth Five Year Plan has suggested setting up of an independent pharmaceutical regulatory authority dealing with major issues such as drug pricing, quality control and licensing of drugs. The Plan, however, advises against deregulation of prices of essential drugs in the next few years. The Plan document, approved by the National Development Council (NDC), pointed out a wide gap between regulation and implementation regarding the quality of drugs (Amiti Sen, 2003).

Studies by Anant Phadke, 2003; Amit Sen Gupta, 1996 etc shows that the India’s drug pricing mechanism has proved to be ineffective in keeping down drug prices. Drug prices in India are not only rising but the pricing system is grossly irrational and exploitative. Depending upon the monopoly rights, the manufacturers or the traders pocket huge profits by exploiting the consumers. According to the industry, drug prices in India are the cheapest in the world. Yet within the country, prices of drugs have been increasing and access to these medicines is increasingly getting restricted to those who can afford (Lalitha N, 2002). The main reason for low drug price level in India is low purchasing power of Indian patients in the health care system where very few are covered by health insurance and controlled drug pricing system (Sanjay Kumar, 1995). In addition few studies (Roy V, Rewari S 1998) discussed about the ambiguous drug pricing and claimed that there exists a wide variation in prices of drugs manufactured by different companies. In the absence of comparative information on drug prices and their quality it is difficult for physicians to prescribe the most economical treatment.

The India Health Report 2003 conveys that the pharmaceutical industry is already feeling the impact of globalization. Indian companies such as Dr Reddy’s Laboratories, Ranbaxy, Wockhardt, Sun pharmaceuticals, and Cipla have begun marking significant investments in product research in anticipation of the new IPR regime. The implications of the recent changes in pharmaceutical policy are the drug discoveries, which are very expensive and time consuming. The estimates for the development of a new chemical entity (NCE) in India is often quoted at $US90-100 million in comparison with $250 millions in US due to lower input costs in India. For every 10,000 new chemical entities in discovery, ten enter pre-clinical treatment, five enter human trials, and only one may be approved. Product patents limit competition, grant monopoly power, and encourage high prices.

India should now actively explore ways in which the advantages of the new regime can be maximized and disadvantages minimized. Indians must try to make the best of the present scenario, as India is relatively better off than many other developing countries because it has a reasonably well-developed pharmaceutical sector. Indians must do their best to help make Indian firms more capable of undertaking research and development and to be more competitive in exports. This can be facilitated by providing generous tax incentives for undertaking research and development, and by allowing liberal imports of raw materials with minimum import duties. Export procedures should also be further simplified so that they do not become a hindrance in the growth of exports. Indians should also actively encourage technological collaboration with foreign firms and the inflow of foreign direct investment in the pharmaceuticals industry as ways to bring new technology, research and managerial capabilities into this important sector of the economy.

 

 

| | | | | |